Skip to content
Compensation System
Lock reference · Draft
v0.1.0

Make and Communicate a Compensation Decision

Authorize, communicate, implement, and verify an employee compensation decision from one controlled review package.

Adopt · export.mdAdopt · export.jsonDraft reference — not a fitted standard

Profile

Purpose

Turn compensation analysis into an affordable, consistent, explainable, accurately implemented decision without informal promises, retroactive rationale, or payroll drift.

Intended outcome

One authorized decision version, understood by the employee to the appropriate extent, implemented in every affected system, reconciled to approval, and returned to compensation governance as evidence.

Accountable
Compensation decision owner
Operator
Compensation-process owner
Use when
  • — A Compensation Decision Intake is accepted.
  • — A regular pay cycle, correction, role change, retention action, incentive, equity, premium, or other governed decision reaches approval.
  • — A prior decision requires controlled amendment before its effective date.

Entry gate

  • The decision owner accepts a versioned Compensation Decision Intake with options, evidence, cost, conditions, and required reviews.
  • Budget and authority are available for the decision type and amount.
  • Communication, effective-date, implementation, confidentiality, and specialist requirements are known.

Exit gate

  • The exact approved or no-change decision, rationale, conditions, authority, and communication are recorded.
  • Affected systems and owners reconcile implementation to the approved version.
  • The employee has an appropriate question, correction, and escalation route and governance receives outcome evidence.

Flow · 7 controlled steps

  1. 01

    Accept the decision intake

    Confirm that the analysis and authority are ready for decision.

    • — Verify employee, role and mapping versions, review-record version, options, recommendation, cost, effective date, budget, conditions, risks, and unresolved questions.
    • — Confirm decision, finance, payroll, equity, benefits, board, employment, labor, tax, and specialist authorities as applicable.
    • — Check that no employee promise or implementation has preceded approval.
    • — Return specific evidence gaps to review rather than recreating analysis informally.
    Responsible
    Compensation-process owner
    Output
    Authorized Decision Docket
    Decision
    Is the exact package complete and authorized for decision?
  2. 02

    Evaluate options and system effects

    Compare alternatives using the company’s approved compensation logic and complete consequences.

    • — Compare no-change and action options against philosophy, structure, legitimate factors, internal relationships, market evidence, prior commitments, and review limitations.
    • — Test immediate and forward cost, budget, compression, inversion, precedent, range integrity, retention, career relationships, and workforce effects.
    • — Review component-specific uncertainty and conditions without converting equity, incentive, benefits, or premiums into guaranteed cash equivalents.
    • — Document material tradeoffs and what additional information could change the decision.
    Responsible
    Compensation decision owner
    Output
    Compensation Option Decision Analysis
    Decision
    Which options remain coherent, affordable, authorized, and acceptable in risk?
  3. 03

    Complete required approvals

    Secure every authority required for the exact proposed decision.

    • — Route the exact component, amount or method, effective date, funding, conditions, and record to required approvers.
    • — Obtain finance, compensation, executive, board, equity, payroll, benefits, employment, labor, tax, or other specialist approval where applicable.
    • — Document conditions, expirations, dissent, and any required implementation controls.
    • — If an approver changes a material term, return the revised version through appropriate analysis before approval.
    Responsible
    Compensation-process owner
    Output
    Approved Compensation Authority Record
    Decision
    Has the exact decision version received every required approval?
  4. 04

    Authorize and freeze the decision

    Create the single source of truth for communication and implementation.

    • — Record change or no-change outcome, each affected component, amount or method, effective date, rationale category, conditions, funding, authority, and limitations.
    • — Separate employee-facing explanation from restricted analysis while preserving consistency.
    • — Define correction, amendment, expiration, and exception authority.
    • — Freeze the authoritative version and prohibit downstream re-interpretation.
    Responsible
    Compensation decision owner
    Output
    Authorized Compensation Decision
    Decision
    Is this exact outcome ready to become the authoritative compensation decision?
  5. 05

    Prepare the manager and communication

    Make the decision understandable without exposing restricted information or creating new promises.

    • — Prepare employee-facing content covering the decision, affected components, effective date, relevant rationale, conditions, next steps, and approved resources.
    • — Train or brief the manager on accurate explanation, component distinctions, questions, confidentiality, and escalation.
    • — Ensure letters, statements, portals, and verbal guidance use the same version and definitions.
    • — Plan communication timing relative to payroll, market disclosure, teams, managers, and other affected populations.
    Responsible
    Compensation-process owner
    Output
    Approved Compensation Communication Package · Ready Communicator Record
    Decision
    Can the assigned communicator explain the decision accurately and answer only within authority?
  6. 06

    Communicate and acknowledge the decision

    Deliver a respectful, accurate decision and controlled response path.

    • — Communicate the exact outcome, affected components, effective date, conditions, approved rationale, and next steps.
    • — Distinguish salary, incentive, equity, benefits, premiums, and other components and avoid unsupported total-value claims.
    • — Invite questions and factual correction and route matters beyond communicator authority.
    • — Record delivery, acknowledgement, questions, corrections, disagreement, and follow-up without requiring agreement.
    Responsible
    Manager or authorized communicator
    Output
    Compensation Communication Record · Employee Questions and Response Record
    Decision
    Does new information require factual correction, amendment review, or specialist escalation?
  7. 07

    Implement, reconcile, and review

    Ensure the approved decision becomes the actual system state and feeds governance.

    • — Transmit the exact decision to payroll, HRIS, equity, incentive, benefits, finance, reporting, and other affected owners using minimum necessary data.
    • — Validate effective dates, amounts, components, approvals, employee statements, downstream calculations, and accounting treatment as applicable.
    • — Reconcile each system and first affected output to the authorized version and correct defects through controlled change.
    • — Review communication, implementation, exceptions, employee questions, internal effects, and structural signals for improvement.
    Responsible
    Compensation-process owner
    Output
    Compensation Implementation Record · Reconciliation and Governance Feedback
    Decision
    Has the exact authorized decision been implemented and reconciled everywhere required?

Connections

Seams · 12 hops within 2 steps

Upstream and downstream neighbourhood over public reference processes only. Each hop shows the trigger, carried objects, and what the receiving process loses if the producing step is skipped.

downstream · hop 1

Open process

Align Role Outcomes and Expectations

Trigger · A separate role or talent decision becomes effective.

Carries · Authorized effective-date notice

If the handoff from Make and Communicate a Compensation Decision is skipped, Align Role Outcomes and Expectations loses Authorized effective-date notice.

downstream · hop 1

Open process

Operate Pay Structures and Equity Controls

Trigger · The decision is implemented or a material structural signal occurs.

Carries · Authorized Compensation Decision · Compensation Implementation Record · Reconciliation and Governance Feedback

If Authorize and freeze the decision; Implement, reconcile, and review is skipped, Operate Pay Structures and Equity Controls loses Authorized Compensation Decision · Compensation Implementation Record · Reconciliation and Governance Feedback.

upstream · hop 1

Open process

Make a Progression or Talent Decision

Trigger · An implemented talent decision requires a compensation decision.

Carries · Authorized Talent Decision · Talent Decision Handoff

If Decide and authorize the talent outcome is skipped, Make and Communicate a Compensation Decision loses Authorized Talent Decision · Talent Decision Handoff.

upstream · hop 1

Open process

Review Employee Compensation

Trigger · The compensation decision owner accepts the review package.

Carries · Compensation Review Record · Compensation Decision Intake

If Form options and hand off the analysis is skipped, Make and Communicate a Compensation Decision loses Compensation Review Record · Compensation Decision Intake.

downstream · hop 2

Open process

Build and Operate a Development Plan

Trigger · Capability evidence changes appropriate work or expectations.

Carries · Development Disposition

If Evaluate transfer and decide the next state is skipped, Align Role Outcomes and Expectations loses Development Disposition.

downstream · hop 2

Open process

Define Role and Success Profile

Trigger · A person is assigned to the role or the role changes.

Carries · Role Success Profile

If the handoff from Define Role and Success Profile is skipped, Align Role Outcomes and Expectations loses Role Success Profile.

downstream · hop 2

Open process

Establish Compensation Range and Employment Parameters

Trigger · A range is approved, used, excepted, or reviewed.

Carries · Approved Compensation and Employment Parameters · Compensation Decision Analysis

If Test affordability, consistency, and risk; Approve and publish the parameters is skipped, Operate Pay Structures and Equity Controls loses Approved Compensation and Employment Parameters · Compensation Decision Analysis.

downstream · hop 2

Open process

Establish the Manager Operating Role

Trigger · The manager charter is approved or changed.

Carries · Manager Operating Charter

If Approve and launch the operating charter is skipped, Align Role Outcomes and Expectations loses Manager Operating Charter.

downstream · hop 2

Open process

Maintain Job and Career Architecture

Trigger · The pay structure is operated or reviewed.

Carries · Approved Job and Career Architecture · Role Mapping Records · Architecture Decision Records

If Approve and publish the architecture is skipped, Operate Pay Structures and Equity Controls loses Approved Job and Career Architecture · Role Mapping Records · Architecture Decision Records.

downstream · hop 2

Open process

Onboard the New Hire

Trigger · The manager accepts transition to normal operation.

Carries · Onboarding Transition Record

If Transition to normal operation and improve is skipped, Align Role Outcomes and Expectations loses Onboarding Transition Record.

downstream · hop 2

Open process

Review Performance and Contribution

Trigger · The review record is assembled.

Carries · Role Outcome Agreements · Outcome Agreement Reviews

If the handoff from Align Role Outcomes and Expectations is skipped, Review Performance and Contribution loses Role Outcome Agreements · Outcome Agreement Reviews.

downstream · hop 2

Open process

Run Manager Check-ins and Feedback

Trigger · The agreement is published or updated.

Carries · Role Outcome Agreement

If Approve the outcome agreement is skipped, Run Manager Check-ins and Feedback loses Role Outcome Agreement.

Roles

Compensation decision owner

Owns tradeoffs, risk, exact outcome, conditions, authority, amendments, and final rationale.

Compensation-process owner

Controls intake, approvals, versioning, communication readiness, records, implementation, reconciliation, and feedback.

Manager or authorized communicator

Explains only the approved decision, receives questions, makes no side commitments, and follows through.

Finance partner

Confirms funding, current and forward cost, timing, accounting, and affordability.

Payroll, equity, incentive, benefits, HRIS, or implementation owner

Implements the exact authorized component and provides reconciliation evidence.

Systems + Data

Data object

Authorized Decision Docket

Controls the exact review package, authority, budget, timing, and required approvals.

System of record · Compensation decision workflow

Data object

Authorized Compensation Decision

Provides the single authoritative outcome for communication and implementation.

System of record · Compensation system

Data object

Compensation Communication Record

Preserves what was communicated, when, by whom, and what requires response.

System of record · Secure employee or compensation workflow

Data object

Compensation Implementation Record

Reconciles the authorized decision to every affected system and output.

System of record · Compensation and payroll control repository

Secure compensation decision and approval workflow

Required

Controls exact versions, authority, budget, approvals, access, amendment, and history.

Employee communication and acknowledgement

Required

Keeps approved materials, delivery, questions, corrections, and follow-up connected.

Payroll, HRIS, equity, incentive, benefits, and finance implementation

Required

Applies component decisions through appropriate specialist-owned systems.

Reconciliation and exception management

Required

Compares approved and implemented states and controls defects and amendments.

Measures

outcome

Compensation decision operating effect

Does the decision produce its intended pay relationship or correction without unacceptable system effects?

Structured review of intended rationale, implemented pay, internal relationships, employee questions, retention context, budget, and structural effects; not causal attribution alone.

At defined post-decision review

quality

Decision control completeness

Does every communicated decision contain exact evidence, authority, approvals, rationale, conditions, and implementation controls?

Communicated decisions satisfying all required control fields divided by all communicated decisions.

Before communication

cycle-time

Decision-to-communication cycle time

How long does accepted analysis take to reach accurate employee communication?

Elapsed time from docket acceptance to communication, separated by evaluation, approval, preparation, and scheduling waits.

Weekly during cycle

adoption

Authoritative decision use

Are approvals, communications, systems, and outputs linked to the same authorized version?

Applicable events and system records linked and reconciled to the authoritative version divided by all applicable events and records.

Per decision and payroll cycle

exceptions

Compensation decision exception pattern

Where do approvals, communication, implementation, reconciliation, or employee response fail?

Exceptions by component, stage, owner, cause, severity, employee impact, and disposition.

Per cycle and quarterly

guardrail

Consistency, equity, privacy, dignity, and promise guardrail

Do decisions or communications show unexplained differences, inappropriate disclosure, retaliation concern, misleading component claims, or unauthorized promises?

Qualified review of approvals, outcomes, explanations, questions, corrections, access, and patterns; not a causal or legal conclusion.

Per cycle and at material signal

Evidence + judgment

Compensation Review and Decision Cycle

cross-source-synthesis

Supports decision-ready analysis, approval workflow, communication, system implementation, and cycle closure.

bicycle-guide · compensation-review-cycle · startup-compensation.artifact.json

The Four-Pillar Compensation Model

source-derived

Supports considering internal consistency, external competitiveness, contribution, and administration as connected decision dimensions.

bicycle-guide · tool-the-four-pillar-compensation-model · startup-compensation.artifact.json

Salary Structure Design

source-derived

Supports internal relationships, range integrity, compression, affordability, market position, and administrability.

bicycle-guide · comp-pay-structure · salary_structure_design

Compensation Decision Governance

cross-source-synthesis

Supports explicit authority, approval matrices, documentation, exceptions, effective dates, segregation, and audit history.

bicycle-guide · compensation-governance · startup-compensation.artifact.json

Pay Communication and Manager Enablement

cross-source-synthesis

Supports consistent manager preparation, clear component explanations, timing, employee questions, and escalation.

bicycle-guide · pay-communication · startup-compensation.artifact.json

Procedural Fairness in Consequential Decisions

cross-source-synthesis

Supports consistent procedure, relevant information, explanation, respectful treatment, voice, and correction routes.

bicycle-guide · procedural-fairness · hr-practice-and-talent.artifact.json

Employee Voice and Response

cross-source-synthesis

Supports meaningful questions, factual correction, response, acknowledgement distinct from agreement, and follow-through.

bicycle-guide · employee-voice · hr-practice-and-talent.artifact.json

Payroll Change and Reconciliation Controls

cross-source-synthesis

Supports authorized inputs, effective dating, segregation, validation, first-output review, reconciliation, correction, and audit record.

bicycle-guide · payroll-controls · hr-practice-and-talent.artifact.json

Lock review-before-decision principle

lock-judgment

Lock judgment: compensation authority acts on an accepted versioned review rather than informal advocacy or desired outcomes.

lock · lock-method

Lock whole-pay-decision principle

lock-judgment

Lock judgment: decisions consider the employee, role, internal relationships, market, contribution, budget, precedent, structure, and connected effects together.

lock · what-lock-is

Lock one-decision-version principle

lock-judgment

Lock judgment: one exact authorized version controls every approval, explanation, record, and implementation event.

lock · lock-method

Lock compensation-communication boundary

lock-judgment

Lock judgment: explain the decision and its legitimate logic clearly while protecting restricted individual, comparison, and privileged information.

lock · lock-method

Lock no-manager-side-deal principle

lock-judgment

Lock judgment: managers communicate decisions and route questions; they do not invent promises, explanations, or alternate terms.

lock · what-lock-is

Lock decision-to-system principle

lock-judgment

Lock judgment: the process is incomplete until approved, communicated, recorded, calculated, and paid states reconcile.

lock · lock-method

Draft reference standard. Requires qualified compensation, finance, employment, labor, pay-equity, discrimination, payroll, benefits, equity, securities, tax, accounting, privacy, board, regulatory, and jurisdiction-specific review before deployment.