{"slug":"review-performance-and-contribution","name":"Review Performance and Contribution","family":"Performance and Development System","version":"0.1.0","status":"draft","note":"draft reference — not a fitted standard","summary":"Reach a fair, evidence-based view of contribution across the actual expectations, context, support, and changes that governed the review period.","purpose":"Create an explainable performance conclusion and useful forward decisions without letting recency, personality, one metric, or an undocumented standard substitute for the whole record.","steps":[{"sequence":1,"name":"Assemble the governed review record","purpose":"Establish the expectations and evidence that legitimately apply."},{"sequence":2,"name":"Invite the role holder’s account","purpose":"Add work knowledge, results, context, learning, and disagreement before manager judgment closes."},{"sequence":3,"name":"Evaluate contribution against the agreement","purpose":"Form a whole-record judgment using the standards that actually applied."},{"sequence":4,"name":"Calibrate interpretation and consistency","purpose":"Test standards and reasoning across comparable decisions without forcing false sameness."},{"sequence":5,"name":"Approve the review conclusion","purpose":"Create one authorized contribution record without absorbing downstream decisions."},{"sequence":6,"name":"Discuss and acknowledge the review","purpose":"Create shared understanding without requiring agreement as a condition of voice."},{"sequence":7,"name":"Route decisions and improve the system","purpose":"Turn the review into controlled forward action and process learning."}],"connections":[{"direction":"upstream","processName":"Run Manager Check-ins and Feedback","processSlug":"run-manager-check-ins","trigger":"The authorized formal review point occurs."},{"direction":"upstream","processName":"Align Role Outcomes and Expectations","processSlug":"align-role-outcomes","trigger":"The review record is assembled."},{"direction":"downstream","processName":"Build and Operate a Development Plan","processSlug":"build-and-operate-development-plan","trigger":"Development is an accepted forward implication."},{"direction":"downstream","processName":"Make a Progression or Talent Decision","processSlug":"make-progression-or-talent-decision","trigger":"A separate talent decision is authorized."}],"plannedConnections":[],"measures":[{"name":"Review decision usefulness","definition":"Structured review of understanding, accepted handoffs, and subsequent action quality; not agreement or rating distribution alone.","cadence":"Per cycle"},{"name":"Material conclusion evidence coverage","definition":"Material conclusions with traceable expectation, evidence, context, and limitation divided by all material conclusions.","cadence":"At approval"},{"name":"Review cycle time","definition":"Elapsed time by stage, separating evidence, manager, calibration, approval, and discussion waits.","cadence":"Weekly during cycle"},{"name":"Controlled review-method use","definition":"Completed reviews satisfying the active method divided by all completed reviews.","cadence":"Per cycle"},{"name":"Review exception pattern","definition":"Exceptions by type, manager, process stage, severity, cause, and disposition.","cadence":"Per cycle"},{"name":"Fairness, dignity, privacy, and surprise guardrail","definition":"Qualified review of conclusions, evidence, corrections, responses, access, handoffs, and participant feedback; not a causal or legal conclusion.","cadence":"Per cycle and at material signal"}]}