{"slug":"align-role-outcomes","name":"Align Role Outcomes and Expectations","family":"Performance and Development System","version":"0.1.0","status":"draft","note":"draft reference — not a fitted standard","summary":"Turn the role and current business context into a small, coherent, revisable set of outcomes, operating expectations, evidence, and support commitments.","purpose":"Give a person and manager one shared definition of useful work without confusing activity, aspiration, or a numerical target with the whole job.","steps":[{"sequence":1,"name":"Confirm the operating context","purpose":"Anchor expectations in current work and business need."},{"sequence":2,"name":"Define the material outcomes","purpose":"State what should be different because the work succeeds."},{"sequence":3,"name":"Define operating expectations and authority","purpose":"Describe how results must be pursued within the surrounding system."},{"sequence":4,"name":"Design evidence and interpretation","purpose":"Make progress discussable without pretending one number explains performance."},{"sequence":5,"name":"Agree resources, support, and development","purpose":"Make organizational commitments as visible as individual expectations."},{"sequence":6,"name":"Approve the outcome agreement","purpose":"Create one authoritative version for work and feedback."},{"sequence":7,"name":"Review and control changes","purpose":"Keep expectations current without rewriting history."}],"connections":[{"direction":"upstream","processName":"Define Role and Success Profile","processSlug":"define-role-success-profile","trigger":"A person is assigned to the role or the role changes."},{"direction":"upstream","processName":"Onboard the New Hire","processSlug":"onboard-new-hire","trigger":"The manager accepts transition to normal operation."},{"direction":"downstream","processName":"Run Manager Check-ins and Feedback","processSlug":"run-manager-check-ins","trigger":"The agreement is published or updated."}],"plannedConnections":[],"measures":[{"name":"Outcome alignment quality","definition":"Structured review of shared understanding and decision use, supported by examples rather than self-report alone.","cadence":"At approval and formal review"},{"name":"Agreement completeness","definition":"Required agreement fields accepted or explicitly waived divided by all required fields.","cadence":"At approval"},{"name":"Time to outcome alignment","definition":"Elapsed time from accepted trigger to published agreement, with waiting causes classified.","cadence":"Monthly"},{"name":"Agreement use in check-ins","definition":"Applicable check-ins referencing the current agreement and relevant outcomes divided by all applicable check-ins.","cadence":"Monthly"},{"name":"Expectation change pattern","definition":"Material changes by trigger, cause, timing, affected outcome, and approval.","cadence":"Quarterly"},{"name":"Goal distortion and workload guardrail","definition":"Context-specific review of quality, safety, ethics, collaboration, workload, exceptions, and participant feedback.","cadence":"At every formal review"}]}